Paper Title:

 

indian BPO: the transformation into a global model

 

 

Paper based on project implemented at:

Infosys BPO

(Erstwhile known as Progeon)

 

 

 

Author:

Abhishek Sinha

T.A. Pai Management Institute (TAPMI), Manipal.

sinha.07@mail.tapmi.org

http://abhishekrocks.tripod.com/

( 91-98443 82476

 

 

The world is abuzz today with the waves which Business Process Outsourcing is making. There are multiple players in the BPO industry, especially in an intensely competitive market like Asia where newer and cheaper players are entering in huge flocks. But India stands apart from the conventional players due to various reasons.

The most important factor for the Indian lead in outsourcing is the cost arbitrage. This is the factor on which the whole BPO industry hinges on. However this cost advantage can be split up under the following heads:

 

·        Labor Arbitrage: The cost of skilled educated knowledge workers, at all levels of hierarchy is much lower as compared to other developed countries.

·        Capital: The cost of setting up a business and running it from India are significantly lower, whether it be infrastructure or cost of operations.

·        Labor management: The problem of Bench Stagnancy prevalent in most in-house handled processes is mitigated as India currently has a plethora of projects and keeps shuffling employees between projects so that nobody is “on the bench”, and human resources are optimally utilized.

 

We can take the example of the Mortgage Origination Industry and see how much benefits are given by the cost advantage:

Source: Trinity Avendus BPO Sector Report

 

However, and it is a big “however” in the BPO industry, the current model of BPO in India is not sustainable. This means that if India continues with the current model of BPO, there is very little chance that it will be able to retain its edge as the leader in the BPO industry. Here are a few reasons:

 

  • Cost Advantage is always short-lived:

India was once an under developed nation, today it is a developing one, and the day is not very far off when it will be known as a developed nation. As the economy of the nation becomes better, the expectation of the people rises, the lifestyle becomes better, and the demands become more. Hence what could have been “cheaper” labor will no more be cheap, infrastructure prices would shoot up and cost would become more of a disadvantage.

 

  • Client Satisfaction:

If today the outsource client is satisfied only with cost satisfaction, tomorrow he might not be. Very soon the BPO clients will start asking “What more can you offer me?” and the vendors need to be ready with the answers. Clients can be obtained and lured with petty benefits, but for long time retention, a vendor needs to look beyond client satisfaction and work towards delighting the client with something extra.

 

  • Alternate Destinations:

India is not an exclusive destination for BPO. There are many nations close on the heels of India, lagging behind maybe just because they joined the bandwagon a bit late. If India does not better itself at every step, it will surely be overtaken by the other competitors.

 

Given below is a comparison chart of the alternate destinations in the BPO industry based on some factors which attract clients.

On the basis of the above, and adding a few more countries, we may consider where the pie rests in the BPO industry at present. This can be seen by the following NASSCOM chart:

 

 

 

Hence it is very important that India realizes that it has to develop a new model for its BPO industry in order to move one step higher in the value chain.

 

The ex-CEO of Progeon Mr. Akshaya Bhargava says in his article From Order Takers to Heart Surgeons, “We need to be a lot more prescriptive and develop the skills and the confidence of a heart surgeon. When a patient goes in for heart surgery, he expects the doctor to be an expert. The last thing he expects is to give the doctor instructions on what to do. Much the same way, what customers are looking for from Indian BPOs is expertise, experience and complete solutions. They want us to be heart surgeons of BPO. We should be able to tell them that the experience could be traumatic for them. But, if they follow our prescriptions, they will emerge as better and more profitable.”

 

India can follow the following alternatives to retain the competitive advantage that it possesses today:

 

1. Transformational / Value Added Outsourcing

The aim is to adopt the mantra “We don’t just make it cheaper, we make it better”. Transformational Outsourcing aims to transform a process which is outsourced into a much better and more efficient process apart from making it cheaper.

This modus operandi for outsourcing changes the reason why the client would want to outsource. Initially clients would outsource only if they thought that the outsource service provider would provide cheap services. But with the Expertise Oriented concept a client out-sources a process because he has the expertise in the process as that is what he specializes

 

A very good example of this is Progeon (now Infosys BPO). It follows a phased process where it delivers not just the cost advantage but a lot more to the client.

The following is the model of Transformational Outsourcing that they follow:

Source: www.progeon.com

Once again, whenever a process is obtained from a client, there is a specific methodology followed in bringing the process from the client end to the Progeon center. The transformation process starts right from the point of time that a BPO provider like Progeon starts taking interest in a clients process. They first study and understand in the complete process in Discovery, then ‘migrate’ the operating capabilities to the vendor site in the Transition phase and then ‘migrate’ the actual process and operations in the Parallel Run in a phased manner. The next stage is the smooth running of the process at the vendors end with complete operating requirements in place, and this stage is the Steady State. And the final phase is to continuously optimize, tweak and improve the process according to the new environment to reap maximum benefits from the process at minimum cost. This is the transformational cycle. Now let us see each phase as Progeon follows it.

 

Discovery1:

The Discovery phase of the Progeon methodology involves aggregating and understanding the client's processes, identifying processes that can be outsourced, articulating the risk around these processes, and developing a business case for the client

 

Transition1:

Transition is the process of migrating knowledge, systems, and operating capabilities. It typically follows identification of appropriate processes and vendor selection.

The following diagram shows the Transition Management process in detail:

                                Source:www.progeon.com

 

Parallel Run1:

The objective is to test the successful migration of processes to the offshore location, while ensuring that interdependent processes are not adversely affected. This takes place in the following stages:

           Preparation of the ramp-up schedule

           Logistics management (shift timings, transportation, food, etc.)

           Execution of offshore ramp-up and onsite ramp-down while maintaining the continuity of operations and service levels

                   Source:www.progeon.com

 

Steady State1:

‘Steady state operations’ is the on-going delivery of services. It also encompasses continuous process improvements in collaboration with the client.

The objectives of the steady state are the establishment of "Business as usual" for the client, where the outsourced processes are executed as per norms laid down in the Service Level Agreement (SLA).

 

1 Information obtained from Progeon website (http://www.progeon.com/) as on August 21, 2006.

 

2. Platform Based Outsourcing:

A concept in which the outsource service provider not just provides the services for a process but also provides the software platform for the process. This results in a long and mutually beneficial relationship between the client and service provider because of high dependency on the service provider for reasons other than cost advantage.

This is a classic example of non-standard thinking. As the ex CEO of Progeon Akshaya Bhargava in his paper “The Need For Purple Cows” puts it: “If the Indian BPO industry does not have non-standard thinking, non-standard business models, and the courage to experiment we will lose the initial lead we have over our competitors. The real battle is not between one Indian BPO company and another but between India and China.”

 

 

In order to be able to move up the value chain and provide Platform Based Outsourcing Solutions, Indian BPO vendors would require to adopt a Process Platforms or Packages.

On adopting a Process Platform or Package, the BPO vendors would have to deliver all its new services using the platform. The Platform Outsourcing Strategy clearly means that the platform will be used only for the Tier 2 clients to begin with. As for the tier 1 clients who are the present customers of the vendors (or otherwise) and who have the bargaining power and muscle to make the vendors use a platform of their choice, the vendor will continue to provide transformation services by improving productivity through a combination of BPO & IT redesign.

 

The Platform Strategy: The Objectives

  • Offering something beyond Labor Arbitrage

Labor and Cost Arbitrage have always been the primary reasons why organizations all over the world have been outsourcing. The cost factor is extremely important to initiate the outsourcing of a process, however it is not enough to sustain the outsourced process. After a certain amount of time the client will look for further benefits and a cost arbitrage alone would not suffice as a reason for the client to retain an outsourced vendor. A platform based outsourcing solutions goes beyond cost arbitrage and hence differentiates the service provider from others.

 

 

  • Lesser dependency on client platforms

In a usual process or end to end outsourcing scenario the platforms on which the processes are executed are usually provided by the client. This increases the dependency on the client with regard to a lot of aspects. It implies that the service provider is dependent on the client for all further updates of the platform, the initial and the subsequent update training for employees using the platform and the system requirement specifications for a process. On the other hand if the service provider offers a platform along with the services, the client tends to forge a long term relationship as it will be a very expensive task to break the relationship. This is so because in case of withdrawal of a process, the whole process will have to be restructured by the client as per the new platform.

 

  • Greater Process Expertise

If a service provider will be working on only one platform for all clients and all processes the expertise of the organization with regard to the platform and the knowledge about the handling of the process and the platform workflow will be much higher as compared to a scenario where the service provider works on separate platforms for separate clients and separate processes.

 

  • One step “Business Transformation”

Most intelligent BPO players know that Business Transformation is absolutely necessary for any process outsourced by a client. However nearly all service providers carry out this transformation over a prolonged period of time thus showing increased productivity at each stage. With a platform based solution with which a service provider has adequate expertise, the client will experience a one step “Business Transformation” with reduced initial transition risks and immediate productivity benefits.

 

 

 

  • Shorter & Cheaper Transition

The phase of Transition is a very important part of converting a normal in-house process to an outsourced one. This involves a lot of time, effort and cost. However in the case of a platform based solution the time, costs and efforts are much less as compared to any other form of outsourcing lower in the value chain.

 

3. Global Delivery Model for Outsourcing

 

“When you can’t beat them, join them”

 

When we talk of GDM in the BPO scenario, we first need to address the issue of why GDM can be the solutions to the problems currently facing the BPO Industry.

When we say that the BPO industry is developing competitors for India in the form of alternate BPO destinations, a simple question needs to be asked “Instead of trying to compete with the new destinations, why don’t we simply join hands with them for mutual combined benefits of our expertise with their location/cost factors.

This would mean that Indian BPOs having been on the scene for a longer time, guide the new and upcoming BPOs in other locations and develop a network of combined services which become an irresistible offering for any client.

There are some myths about the Global Delivery Model which need to be clarified and only then can we take a decision on implementing it in the BPO scenario.

GDM is not a sum of offshore services and onsite presence. Neither can it be achieved by make offshore services as a plug in feature or using onsite presence as an add-on.

 

2 Global Delivery Model is a combination of onsite model and offshore model but unlike the onsite/offshore model wherein the offshore development center of service provider is located at only one place, in the global delivery model the service provider has its offshore development centers spread out across the entire globe. The service provider need not have their own offshore development centers across the globe but they can use the resources of their partners located around the globe, and thus follow a global delivery model. This provides the client with a large working team with varied qualities and expertise in different fields.

 

2 Tasks accomplished by the onsite team:

  • Understanding the client’s requirements.
  • Directly interacting with the client to get a better idea of their needs and changes in them, if any.
  • Acting as a mediator between the client and the offshore development centers.
  • Planning & Designing the initial steps of the project.
  • Allocation of Tasks amongst the available resources.
  • Testing the outcome of the project in tandem with the client’s team.
  • Executing the project successfully at the client’s place.
  • Provide the required support for maintenance.

 

Tasks accomplished at the offshore development center:

  • Detailed design that will be continuation of what the onsite team designed.
  • Deciding any specific technological requirements for the project.
  • Development.
  • Testing before handing over to onsite team.
  • Continuous technical support.

2 Global delivery model is preferred where the client requires that the job be done in a quick manner, which is made possible by the number of offshore teams working together towards the completion of the task. Also where the project is very big requiring sufficient skilled manpower to complete the task this is the only model, which provides solution in such cases. The level of risk involved is also minimum since even if any of the offshore development centers face any disaster the project work will not be stopped, as the work can be transferred immediately and continued by the remaining offshore development centers.

Having a perfect co-ordination between all the offshore development centers and that too in accordance with the client’s satisfaction is a big task. However this limitation can be overcome today by making the best possible use of the most modern means of communication.

Mindtree Consulting believes that the IT Services push is towards affordability and it clearly distinguishes between Offshore, Onshore and GDM:

Source: The Global Delivery of IT Services by Joseph King, A Mindtree Consulting White Paper

 

Notes:

1 Information obtained from Progeon website (http://www.progeon.com/) as on August 21, 2006.

2. The matter is obtained from the following website

http://www.offshore-softwaredevelopment.com/.  

 

Bibliography:

  • Trinity Avendus BPO Sector Report
  • From Order Takers to Heart Surgeons by Akshaya Bharghava
  • The Global Delivery of IT Services by Joseph King, A Mindtree Consulting White Paper
  • Evaluation of Mortgage Origination Packages, A Progeon Project by Abhishek Sinha, TAPMI
  • http://www.tutorial-reports.com
  • http://www.carretek.com
  • http://www.xicom.biz/research.html
  • http://www.offshore-softwaredevelopment.com

 

 

Annexure 1: Competitor Data available from http://www.xicom.biz/research.html

 

China

In the outsourcing field, China is the biggest challenge in the future and the largest threat to India. With the largest population and fastest economic growth, China has at least two strengths in the global outsourcing market: manufacturing and IT.

The main advantages of China are as follows:

  • Lower Manpower costs: The Chinese workers cost about 15 percent less than equally qualified Indians.
  • Japan Advantage: China is likely to grow through the Japanese outsourcing route. The advantages that China has are Japan's proximity to China, similarity of the languages. India currently offers almost no BPO services in Japan.
  • Extremely low cost real estate and power: These costs are lower than in India. This can be a very attractive to the US companies, which are looking for cost cutting due to the downturn.
  • Proactive Govt.: The govt. is very friendly to this sector and has taken the following steps.

1.      English teaching and other skill sets: Over $5.4 billion was invested in nine universities in China to promote English language and other skill sets.

2.      Increasing telecom density and PC penetration: China scores over India in these aspects and intends to further increase the gap.

  • Leveraging on the manufacturing image: Western manufacturing companies have found that outsourcing their manufacturing function to China for their companies' global operation can be profitable and also of good quality.

 

The main disadvantages of China are as follows:

  • Lack of a good Quality record in Software: India has a better image as a quality supplier mostly due to its track record of better quality software than China.
  • Low English speaking population: This is the biggest drawback of China. It has a very small proportion of the population speaking fluent English.
  • Less mature: The Indian business processes are much more mature. China has only recently entered into BPO. As such, despite lower billing rates, total project costs in China would turn out be higher because of the higher overheads incurred.

 

Philippines

 

In the Philippines the manpower costs are 60 to 80 percent lower as compared to UK and US. The average salary cost is around $700-800 per month in the BPO sector. The country has a shortage of manpower mainly due to the small population as compared to India. The manpower base for BPO is only 300,000. Right now the country is getting business from nearly 70 companies employing more than 12,000 people with revenues of US$ 250 million.

The main advantages of Philippines are as follows:

 

  • Large scale technical training program: The govt. has initiated a no. of policies by which the skills can be provided to a larger population.
  • Improved telecom and office infrastructure: Philippines scores over India in this respect.
  • 3rd largest English-speaking nation in the world: This is a very important advantage.
  • Well developed IT skill set: It is considered 2nd only to India due to performance in software.
  • Costs of technology workers: This is(which represents the biggest recurring costs for, say, a B2B site) is only around 16% to 25% in the Philippines to that of comparable workers from the United States.
  • Former American colony: As a former American colony, American culture and language is widely emulated here. These cultural and communications skills could prove to be so appealing to American firms that they would outweigh slightly higher labor costs in the Philippines.

 

The main disadvantages of Philippines are as follows:

  • Low graduate turnout: Philippines has a low graduate turnout (only 400,000 per annum). This compares very unfavorably with India.
  • Not having a record of high quality: India has consistently delivered very high quality in Software and has built a very high reputation in it.
  • Political instability: The country has frequent elections which makes it difficult for companies to outsource as there is lack of uniformity of policies with changes in the Govt.
  • No disaster recovery facilities or multi-location facilities: After the WTC bombing terrorism has become a very important issue for the US companies in particular and they want that the BPO providers should have multi location facilities which can be used in case of any terrorist attack.
  • Issue of scaling up: Philippines faces the important issues of scaling up. Issues like scaling up have stunted the growth of BPO activities being outsourced to Philippines. The largest call Centre in Philippines of AOL has only 800 people. The size of the Philippines BPO industry is only $100 million, whereas India's BPO industry is presently at $1.5 billion (2001-02).

 

Ireland

It was one of the front runners in the BPO and started much earlier than India. Thus it has built good brand equity in US. It has a very conducive regulatory framework and is known for excellent quality standards. The country that has strategically pursued developing outsourcing services market and is planning to invest heavily in telecom infrastructure ($5 billion over 10 years).

 

But it suffers from a very big disadvantage of a lack of a large human resource pool. It has nearly 500 companies employing more than 40,000 people. Also it compares very poorly with India and China in terms of Manpower costs. Ireland is actually the biggest exporter of software services in the world today. But there is currently a shortage of programmers in Ireland and companies are forced to outsource work to India.

The other countries, which have a share in the BPO sector, are given below. These countries are not serious competitors to India mostly due to the small population base.

 

Australia

It has a mature BPO industry with 4000 call centers employing 225,000 people with US$ 5.7 billion revenue. It has the advantage of large English speaking population with a favorable time zone.

 

Canada

Since only five per cent of total BPO business (by year 2005) from United States would be offshore amounting to US$7.5 billion, Canada and Eastern European States could put severe pressure on India on price front, besides being sought after for their near-shore capabilities by the US.

 

 

 

Annexure 2: Summary of Summer Project done by Abhishek Sinha, TAPMI at Infosys BPO (Erstwhile Progeon)

 

Academic Scope:

The academic scope of the project is immense as this project explores the opportunities present in the field of Outsourcing Value Addition.

Today the outsourcing industry is in dire need for ways to increase their value addition to the outsourced processes. Simply providing a cost or labor arbitrage is not enough in today’s world where there are countries which are offering labor and services cheaper even to Indian standards. There continues to be numerous research attempts at finding out ways in which Outsourcing can become an integral part of a client company work process, where the value addition by outsourcing results in a long standing relationship between client and service provider which is mutually beneficial and not of a short term contractual nature.

This project takes inputs from one of the most notable BPO reports of recent times, “BPO Opportunities in the US Mortgage Market: A Trinity Avendus BPO Sector Report” to carve a policy for Progeon to adopt the Platform Based Outsourcing Process.

As there is no predecessor for this project, at least to the knowledge of the organization domain experts and the project implementation team, this project can be used as a structure to evaluate any new jump in the value chain for the organization. Keeping this in mind the structure of evaluation and the methodology has been documented in detail for the organization for use in any of its future value addition strategies.

This project, as already mentioned earlier, is also being formulated as a classic case where Information Technology has helped an organization move up the value chain and hence enhance its competitive edge.

 

Methodology Adopted:

The methodology followed for this project was as relevant as the project itself, as it had to be formulated from scratch. As no similar project for the evaluation of platforms or for the evaluation of platform vendors in the mortgage field had been done ever, hence deciding on the methodology was an intricate and important task.

The methodology for the implementation of the project was selected keeping in mind the fact that Progeon is new to the concept of offering platform based outsourcing solutions to its clients.

Therefore the methodology followed was to first create the requirements for a Mortgage Origination Platform for Progeon, keeping in mind the Mortgage clients of Progeon and the ways the platform can help improve and support the different outsourced processes in Mortgage Origination.

After the initial requirements were found and documented, the next step was to find the services or the parts of the requirements which will not be fulfilled by any standard Mortgage Origination Platform. These services will be recurring costs in the mortgage origination process and will hence not be taken care of by the platform. There will be specific specialized vendors to whom such services have to be outsourced. Hence the next step involved listing down all these services, the vendors who provide the services, the costs involved and the input and output formats for these processes.

After this a list of all the mortgage vendors was obtained and then the vendors providing technology support to the mortgage origination process was selected. These vendors were in turn made to undergo another short listing process on the basis of judgmental analysis of domain experts within the organization.

The step after this was to form a structure for collecting data on the sort listed vendors and to form a framework for organizing this data. This organized data which encompassed information on all the short listed vendors was called the Vendor Qualification Matrix.

After all the data was collected, the project moved on to the next phase where an algorithm was created in order to quantitatively measure the capability of each vendor in different areas. There was a certain criteria formed and weights were assigned to these criteria with the help of inputs from domain experts.

The vendors were then scored on the basis of the information in the Vendor Qualification Matrix as per the criteria and this quantitative scoring deck was called the Quantitative Vendor Matrix. The vendors were sorted based on their score in the Quantitative Vendor Matrix and the top six vendors were selected and an exhaustive qualitative evaluation was done. Finally two vendors were recommended on the basis of the qualitative evaluation.

This was the complete methodology followed for the “Evaluation of Mortgage Origination Packages” in order to justify the scope of the project and come out with the required deliverables and final output.

 

Major Findings / Recommendations:

The following were the findings which were also tabulated as the project deliverables/outputs and presented to the company at each stage of the project:

 

  1. Mortgage Platform Requirements Structure: A detailed list of the requirements of a platform specifically customized for Progeon.

 

  1. Mortgage Ordered-Out Services: Vendors providing them, Cost Structure of these services, the format of input/output for the service software.

 

  1. Vendor Qualification Matrix: a structure for the collection of data for the vendors. This Qualification Matrix contains detailed data regarding the key customers, the key partners and revenue and profitability growth for the top 22 short listed vendors. A sample of the same is given in the picture.

 

  1. Quantitative Weights and Criteria: The different parameters to be considered during the quantitative scoring of the data collected in the qualification matrix and the numeric weights to be assigned to these parameters. A sample of the same is attached in the picture alongside which gives the weight in the general category.

 

  1. Quantitative Matrix: The QM quantitatively scores each vendor on the assigned parameters as per the weights assigned in the Quantitative Weights and Criteria, sums up the score for all parameters and finally ranks them on the score. Some parts of the matrix are as shown below:

 

 

 

Final Recommendations:

Based on the Quantitative Matrix, the rankings obtained, the following vendors were short listed individually in the two sections of LOS and POS.

 

POS:

  1. Calyx Software
  2. Ellie Mae
  3. Dorado

 

 
LOS:

  1. Dynatek
  2. Mortgage Cadence
  3. GHR Systems

 

After further qualitative analysis on all six vendors the final recommendations were as follows:

Final Recommendation for LOS:

 

 

 


Recommended because it has a Plug-In Partner Network which allows access to unlimited partnerships

 


Final Recommendation for POS:

 

 

 


Recommended because of its alliance with MindBox to overcome the disadvantage of the inability to do custom underwriting.

 

 

 

Further Scope:

  • Research and a Cost Benefit Analysis for Inorganic Growth
  • Research for investment risks for Progeon in a Mergers & Acquisitions Deal
  • Research for evaluation of Vendors for a Mergers & Acquisitions Deal

 

 

Utility of the current project outputs:

  • As inputs for a further Mergers & Acquisitions project
  • To understand the utility for a Mergers & Acquisitions deal
  • For a cost benefit analysis for a Mergers & Acquisitions deal